Feeding up the beast
whore of babylon
Critic of islam vx racism
Iran revelation key
Butterfly of truth!
Manipulation VX Persuasion
The Dschihad SYSTEM
The 'good' Christian
Who Has Ears
Gr.ZERO: Avoid the firebrand!
Apple falls NOT
Crossing the red lines
Europe-fight or go under
"Atheism can be cured"
CAMOUFLAGED OR NON CAMOUFLAGED
GODLESSNESS [ATHEISM] AND EGOISM
ARE THE ROOTS OF ALL FASCISMS
There is no more senseless religion than atheism.
believing in something beyond of the physical senses
is no longer an
atheist. [Ogmios 08.06.11]
BEGINS AS A LIFE WITHOUT HIGHER DIRECTION OR AS
IT MEANS TO REMOVE YOUR ARMOUR
WHICH SAVES YOU
AGAINST THE POWER OF DARK. SUCH ACT
THE FIRST STEP TOWARD DISORIENTATION
FALL BACK INTO BARBARIANISM.
ist die Unkunst der leeren Worte, ein seelenloser Acker auf
dem das Übel hochwuchert wie Unkraut im Dunkel des modrigen
non-art of the empty words, a soulless land on which the evil
overgrows like weeds in the musty darkness of the backyard.
Agnostic VX atheist
The agnostic does
not know what to believe while the atheist does not
believe. Not believing in something does not mean to be
AGAINST. How can you be against something of which you do
even not believe its existence, that would be a
paradox per se. Unless you do not raise the non-belief as
a new religion. Then things change radically. In that case
the atheist becomes the biggest demagogue fascist ever
existed. The damagogue of the religion of the vacuum.
atheist who wants to
religions is de facto an extremist
sane individual will ever try to
prohibit to another
one his beliefs
until they are based on benign
Certainly in the case of
examples as of the bloody
barbarians and totalitarian tyrants like Mohammed or
etc... the subject changes."
sa cosa credere mentre l'ateo non crede. Non credere in una cosa non
significa di essere CONTRO. Come puoi essere contro una cosa se non
credi nemmeno nella sua esistenza, sarebbe un paradosso per se. A
meno che tu non elevi il non-credere come nuova religione. Allora le
cose cambiano radicalmente. In quel caso l'ateo diventa il piu
grande demagogo mai esistito. Il demagogo della religione del vacuum
e non solo.
Un ateo che vuole eliminare le
religioni e' di fatto un secco estremista fascista.
puo voler vietare ad un altro le sue credenze finche si basano su
radici/esempi di carattere benigno, eccetto un fascista. Certo nel
caso degli esempi maligni come dei barbari sanguinosi e tiranni
totalitari tipo Mohammed, Hitler, Lenin, Kim Yong etc... l'argomento
Christians in Europe falling remarkably"
at 19:19 [~1199]
The living example
followed by the Christians is
example is being
given in these days.
living example to be followed by the atheists if not
the bloody historical figures: Hitler, Saddam, Pol
Pot, Mohammed, Yong Kim and all the false gods
plagiarists with bloody hands and the fruit of
wickedness and of the spirit of selfishness and
refuses to follow the examples of highest human and
universal values given by incarnated spiritual
masters such as Jesus Christ the Son, Krishna,
Buddha, and so on, or..
b] shameless abuses of those masters their names for
its own fascist unholy purposes.
[screen shot with
It is not necessary to believe in a God in order to
have values or to respect the next.
What? WHICH values? WHO defines them with WHICH
empty words? And even IF one randomly
interpretes them without tangent in a right [DeXter]
spirit, which may NOT AT ALL always be comfortable,
then HOW LONG would you keep them before jumping to
ANYTHING more comfortable, more populist, more
profitable for yourself like the values of the
socialization of child abuse or the values of the
religious master race appointed to enslave their
women and any under-beings or to your own self made
values according to your own personal wishes, needs
and self-understanding, what EVER it might be or
since for the atheist all that 'helps' is
but instead I tell you it is 5TO 12 !!!
TIME TO DRAW CONCLUSIONS!!!
starts from the
presupposition to be above of everything and everyone yet
nothing exists beyond of his horizon. That is of course
comfortable. Ideal for the lazy and selfish one, since
there is no compulsive need to question your own
convictions, needs and doing anymore. This is the logics
of self-made [therefore: false] gods.
you say that if you don't believe in yourself AND in
god you are wrong. You should change that on that
site to say that those who reject and deny the
POSSIBILITY of a god are 'sinister', because they
It is a possibility that a roof tale falls onto your
scalp next time when you leave your house. Godfather
is no roof tale.
comes the godlessness, then
the false gods and the shamelessness.
der Gottlosigkeit, dann kommen die falschen Götter und
der Missbrauch authentischer, bis ihre
Schweinereien grenzenlos und das Desaster perfekt ist.
Danach waren es 'die Religionen', oder die sogenannten "Rechtsradikalen"
[Ein Paradoxum das es per Definition gar nicht geben
kann], ...nur nicht sie selbst.
The absolute minimum
a human must come to, is
that "there is something higher, and greater". Who does
not come to that minimum level, is a rootless creature,
without any tangent, no armour, faceless, sand in the
wind. Such individual is mathematically and logically at
the doorstep to sinister populism and ideology [=antireligion].
Those are the first one converting to and taking part
within the ideological system either before or after it
takes its grip over a country. For a godless creature
there is no reason anymore, why it shouldn't do so.
1] Real laity
does not exist outside the spirit of
Christ, the foundation of humanism, freedom of the individual,
equality between men and women, democracy and Christian
civilization. Those kind of 'lay people' which have problems with
the Spirit of Christ are the FALSE laity, the sinister one, the
camouflaged fascists, those who love the false plagiarized religions
and ideologies and which abuse of everyone and everything, and which
attitude has led to the bloodiest apocalypses that humanity has ever
suffered due! Other than 'true' lay people...
2] NEVER a real believer can be a tyrant. It's UNTHINKABLE !!!
Mohammed was an atheist. Hitler was an atheist. Kim Yong,
Saddam were atheists. Lenin, Pol Pot were atheists.
Godlessness features the spirit of antichrist and unprincipled
plagiarism in its thousand facets which infiltrates/abuses of
everything and everyone! There exists no antichrist without
-open or camouflaged- atheism
3] Christ is not a faith.
is a REALITY !! Here is speaking
HIS living word. We are no
longer talking about a question of believe but about a
recognition or ignorance! WAKE UP !
are responsible for many wars and must be eliminated.
Authentic religions will
be the last thing eliminated, while the first thing will be
the plagiarisms [ideologies under religious clothes] yet the
camouflaged and non-camouflaged fascists which abuse of both
authentic and false religions but then they say it wasn't them
but the guilty of the religion,
without ever clearly defining what they mean by "religion".
Le religioni sono responsabili
per troppe guerre e vanno quindi eliminate.
Le religioni [autentiche] saranno
l'ultima cosa eliminata, mentre la prima cosa saranno
plagiarismi [a la islam] e i
fascisti camuffati e non quali prima li abusano per poi dire
che non lo sono stati loro ma che e' colpa delle religioni,
senza definire che cosa intendono di "religiione".
Non esiste laicita reale al di fuori dello spirito di cristo
fondamento dell umanismo, liberta' dell individuo, uguaglianza tra
uomo e donna, democrazia e civilizzazione cristiana. Coloro 'laici'
che hanno problemi con lo spirito di Cristo sono i laici FALSI,
sinistri, i fascisti camuffati, quelli che amano le religioni false
e plagiate e le ideologie e che abusano di tutto e di tutti e che
hanno portato le apocalissi piu sanguinosi che l'umanita abbia mai
dovuta subire ! ALTROCHE" laici" veri...
2] MAI un vero credente puo fare il tiranno. E' IMPENSABILE !!!
Mohammed era un ateo. Hitler era un ateo, Kim Yong, Saddam
erano atei, Lenin, Pol Pot erano atei. Empieta caratterizza lo
spirito dell'anticristo e plagiarismo nelle sue mille
sfaccettature che infiltra/abusa di tutto e di tutti! Non
esiste nessun anticristo SENZA ateismo APERTO O CAMUFFATO!
Cristo non e' una fede. Cristo e' una REALITA' !! Qui' parla la SUA parola vivente !!! Non parliamo piu' di una
questione di credenza o non, ma di una questione di
riconoscimento o ignoranza ! SVEGLIA !
THE FATA MORGANA
At the end of the day there
exists no atheism at all, but is just another mask of the
sinister gamblers behind which they can hide by saying
Though the reality its the
In reality you have either a
sinister god or a deXter god. The deXter
[right] one is of a spiritual nature while the sinister one is a wealthy one,
which is that one of the so called atheists. And right is right but left is wrong ...!
/ 56~11 =>
Original screen shot
Note: These numerological hints are certainly not referring to
the book itself but to the very pointing comment of "Atheismus
ist heilbar" here above, figuring under this respective
article. [Ogmios - Spirit of Truth]
Mankind has to realize
that Islam is not a religion but a plagiarism = ideology,
means nothing else than another form of atheism, indeed the
most wicked one ever in the universe.
- Spirit of Truth]
WHO EVER SEPARATES
[AUTHENTIC RELIGION] FROM SCIENCE [EVOLUTION] IS LIKE ONE OF THOSE
CHILDREN OR DEMAGOGUES WHO FOUND WATER IN A SHELL BUT BELIEVED TO
HAVE DISCOVERED THE OCEAN, OR CONFUSE A SINGLE PIECE WHICH THEY
FOUND FOR THE THE WHOLE FINISCED PUZZLE.
RELIGION VX SCIENCE
In other words: It is
not the question if religion or science, since religion is just a
man made product around the spiritual teachers. So for those who
have eyes and ears it is the question between spirituality and
science, while I say you a scientist who believes to have the key in
his hands without spiritual part is the same ignorant than the
religious one who claims to have the key without science. Both of
them see water in a shell but claim to see the ocean. Ogmios-biblical
Spirit of Truth.
arts and sciences are branches of the same tree" - Albert
plagiats" - Ogmios]
spritected and added on 28.01.11
ARE THOSE WHO REFUSE TO ADMIT
THAT THEY CAN DO WRONG YET
JUST AS EVERY HUMAN DID SO.
ATHEISTS WHO CONFRONT ISLAM
the don't do that for any noble
goals, in principle for a little less unnoble than their opponents, namely for their
Atheisten die dem Islam
entgegentreten tun dies nicht für edle Ziele, höchstens für
etwas weniger unedle als deren Gegner, nämlich für deren
3 QUESTIONS FOR THE ATHEIST
1. We may agree that the truth
is the counterpart of the lie. Now, would you deny the
existence of the truth?
2. Do you really believe to be
only a peace of flesh without feelings, heart, soul and/or
3. Do you really believe that
all you can see and all what happens around you is only one
unique gigantic coincidence?
3 QUESTIONI PER L'ATEO
1. Dimmi, secondo te' eiste la
2. Tu credi veramente di essere
solo un pezzi di carne, senza sentimenti, emozioni, senso di
astrazione, quore, anima e/o
3. Tu credi veramente che tutto
quello che tu vedi e che succede attorno di te sia solo una
unica gicantesca coincidenza.
Altri argomenti atei
"Non mi serve il crocifisso per
capire cos'e buono e male. E Cristo punisce i superbi.
Gia il rifiuto di accettare un
esistenza superiore universale e' espressione di
ignoranza ed egoismo pressapoco insuperabile.
Non ti serve il crocifisso, dici. Come definisci tu allora il bene e il male. Ti rendi conto che
sei un demagogo del vacuum senza nessuna tangente, cioe con i
piedi in aria e la testa nelle nuvole. Le tue parole sono come una scatola vuota. Non ce nulla dentro, ogniuno puo
attribuire il significato che gli pare. Se dici "morale" senza
tangete lasci aperto l'interpretazione individuale. Il buon
islamico p.es sotto morale intende ammazzare la figlia
innamorata in un non-musulmano.
Cristo non punisce
nessuno. I superbi si puniscono da soli, e Cristo AVVERTE
Tu prima hai detto che non conta
ciò che le persone che si definiscono in un certo modo (es. i
cristiani nella storia) hanno fatto, bensì ciò che una
dottrina o ideologia o quello che è dice! Perciò, perché
rinfacci ciò che fanno o hanno fatto gli atei se tu scegli di
ignorare ciò che hanno compiuto i cristiani?
Nessuno su questo mondo e'
perfetto. Cosa conta e'
direzione! L'esempio da seguire vivente del
cristianesimo e' Gesu Cristo.
Qual'e l'esempio vivente da seguire degli atei se non le
figure storiche sanguinose: Hitler, Saddam, Pol Pot, Mohammed,
Kim Yong e tutti i falsi dei plagiatori con le mani sanguinose
frutto dell empieta e dello spirito umano egoista e bastardo
che rifiuta di seguire gli esempi di piu grande valore umano
Tu invece sei un volgare bigotto incapace di accettare le
diversità rifiutendo altri religioni come l'islam.
TU non nasconderai il fascismo con la scusa della diversita'.
Dalla tua bocca sinistrata la
richiesta di pluralismo e' pervertita e bastarda come quando
hitler o mussolini accusano i loro critici di essere i
fascisti. VERGOGNIATI ! Tutto va bene, ma non il fascismo in
qualsiasi veste arrivi,
nazionale, sociale o religiosa,
non fa differenza e va rifuituato nella maniera piu assoluta e
I don't need
religion. I am a free person.
sake. You're free for what? For going to restroom when ever
you need? Free is an individual only when ready to go under
the bridge or to be nailed onto the cross, rather than
surrender to the powers of the falsehood.
UNA PERSONA LIBERA"
bisogno di religion. Sono
una persona libera"
Ma per carita'. Libera di che
cosa? Di andare al bagno quando sempre hai bisognio? Libero e'
un individuo solo quando e pronto di andare a vivere sotto il
ponte o di farsi inciodare sulla croce piuttosto di arrendersi
ai poteri della falsita.
WOE THOSE WHO CONFUSE ATHEISM
AND FREEDOM WITH DISORIENTING
LEADING THROUGH ARBITRARINESS
FINALLY TO TOTALITARIANISM
[OGMIOS-SPIRIT OF TRUTH 12.02.11]
There exists much more then theism/theocracy and/or
atheism, free masonry [non-tangented vacuum
demagoguery] out there which both views represent
just the two opposite militant extremes of one and
the same topic, though both of them are the same
wrong in the extent of their extremism because the
truth is not extreme. The truth is
Um es in symbolischer
Eva im Paradies war Freimaurerin.
Sie hat sich selbst über die Gesetze des Universums
The man in a [still] free society
is [still] free to chose the non-choice.
Now, this was eventually a superficially
comfortable way during the times of naked materalism only. Certainly a
very short-sighted choice [and short-sightedness is certainly NOT an
intelligence] , though temporarily and superficially
comfortable. Also one could argue that no choice is
still better then a wrong choice. However, in such case one admits
his own inability to do the right
choice, which again is NOT a sign of
In the coming decennies
those 'non-choice people' may face serious problems with the Islam
plague rising in Europe. Atheists will be the first one to be cursed
and persecuted should islam take over. Though cowards as they are
they prefer to criticize the church and the pope which will not hurt
them while in front of islam they stick their head into the sand,
hoping to stay save on that way.
non significa di essere CONTRO le
religioni o contro Dio, ma di IGNORARLO, a meno che l'ateismo non lo
vogliamo elevare come una nuova religione. E questo che vuoi ?
Non ti rendi conto. Stiamo vivendo il periodo biblico. La scelta che
ce' da fare e' quella tra lo spirito di cristo e/o anticristo.
L'ateo si astiene dalla scelta per evitare di fare la scelta
sbagliata, ma questo non e' certamente un segno di grande
intelligenza, se uno non sa dov'e sotto e sopra
To be atheist
does not mean to be AGAINST
religion and against God, but to IGNORE it, unless you do not want
to elevate atheism as a new religion. And why do you want?
You do not realize. We are living the
biblical times. The choice that we have to do is that one between
the spirit of Christ and/or anti-Christ. The atheist will refrain
from choosing to avoid making the wrong choice, but this is
certainly not a sign of great intelligence, if one doesn't know
where is top and bottom.
IF THERE EXISTS THE
TRUTH [AND IT EXISTS AS THE
LOGIC COUNTERPART OF THE
LIE >] THEN ...HOW COULD ATHEISM EVER BE
SO, IN REALITY ATHEISM IS JUST ANOTHER KIND OF ESCAPE
DOORS TO THE
MANKIND'S ENEMY, LEADING INTO
can atheism be true?
can you ask such a question when atheism
obviously only tells you something about what
a person is NOT.
So, in other
words, atheists do not know anything except of
what they are not.
Well, sincerely, I coud hard
immagine a poorer life philosophy than this one.
Are you aware that the NOT-'attitude' is the
which has brought the bloodiest episodes over the mankind.
No, atheists can know and
believe in plenty of things, they simply do not believe the
claims made by theists that God actually exists, that is all.
Everyone can say that.
Though I am a curious man,
so tell me in WHAT 'they' believe in.
Ok, I will explain you that one
for all: Atheists do not believe in a God. That's it. They do
not have any common believes.
Right. That is what I say. Thank
you anyway for your correct confirmation.
DID YOU KNOW
DID YOU KNOW
Jesus Christ [not an atheist] was the first humanist and
enlightener of his
calibre ever incarnated
on this globe,
the biggest despots ever lived have been godless [atheists] one,
even though some of them abused of the name of some of the highest
moral spiritual teachers for their unholy aims,
3.that atheists [apostles of
the spiritual vacuum] are merely
not able to distinguish between authentic religion [christianity,
buddhism, hinduism, bahai etc..] and ideologies like nazism,
leninis and islam,
democratic CIVILizations constitution has been founded not by
Atheists but by CHRISTIANS and has been sworn in on the bible
[=foundation of the United States],
handful of predicted CHRISTIANS TRUTHFULS [not Atheists] have had
the conviction and courage to rise their voice and confronted the
arising evil of islam fascism defending CIVILization at a time
when no one opened his mouth , -and which today has become a
worldwide movement on all level.
1. Gesu Cristo [e non un ateo] fu il primo umanista del suo calibro
mai incarnato su questo globo,
2. Tutti i piu grandi despoti mai vissuto erano individui senza Dio
[atei], anche se alcuni di loro hanno abusato del nome di alcuni dei
piu alti maestri spirituali e morali per i loro scopi scellerati;
3.Che gli atei non sono in grado di distinguere tra religione
autentica [Cristianesimo, Buddismo, Induismo, Bahai ecc.] e
ideologie come il nazismo, leninismo o l'Islam.
4.the la PRIMA costituzione DEMOCRATICA e CIVILE di questo mondo e
stata fondata non da atei, ma da cristiani ed e stata giurata sulla
bibbia [= fondazione degli Stati Uniti]
5.una manciata di predetti CRISTIANI VERITIERI [e non atei!] hanno
avuto la convinzione e il coraggio di alzare la loro voce di fronte
al male derivante dall'Islamofascismo per difendere i valori CIVILI
nel momento in cui nessuno apriva bocca, e che oggi e diventato un
movimento mondiale su tutti i livelli.
JESUS CHRIST AN ATHEIST?
Jesus Christ was not affiliated to any religion/church. Jesus Christ
didn't even preach organized religion but individual BELIEVE in
GODFATHER and the DIVINE SPIRIT characterized with
Love, Truth, Authenticity,
Believability, Honesty, Altruism, Freedom, Humanism, Common Sense
Under such viewpoint you could define HIM as a DEIST.
Though such kind of highly vulnerable life-philosophy makes only
sense for mankind until
any kind of dangerous ideological basics such as political
socialism, and other ideologies those plagiarized substitutes of the
authentic religions, will be banned by the society and its
leaders and opinion makers. Also the society and its leaders have
definitely to be ready to fight the arising of any such ideology
since from the beginning, including respective law making.
In reality Jesus Christ is the Beginning and the End, the ALPHA and
the ΩMEGA and there exists no corner in which HE can be put.
After the coming Purification Era,
the new Era will finally begin, with the:
NEW REAL COMMUNIONISM UNDER 11:11
[NOT THE POLITICALLY IMPOSED ONE]
THE ERA OF
HIGHER RELIGIONS and AUTHENTIC SPIRITUALITY
For the underwritten, as the one whom
HE has risen up,
Jesus Christ was certainly the
greatest and most revolutionary
AND DOER ever lived on this globe.
Now let me
question the atheist:
ISN'T ATHEISM JUST
OF CHEAP CONFORMISM BY
GIVING UP THINKING ?
ISLAM IST KEINE
"Immer wieder erstaunlich ist die Naivität offensichtlich
linksgerichteter Diskussionsteilnehmer, die aus einer
kirchenfeindlichen Position hoffen, mit der Förderung des Islam den
Einfluss des Christentums in der Gesellschaft noch weiter zurück
drängen zu können. Mancher ist sich da wohl nicht bewusst, was er
sich im Gegenzug ins Land holt".
gesehen auf PI >
THE ESCAPE - DIE FLUCHT
Atheism is no position taking but the
decision for no position, for the nothing. In other words: Atheism is an ESCAPE !
Atheismus ist keine Stellungnahme
sondern die Entscheidung zu KEINER Stellungnahme. D.h. eine
non e' una presa di posizione, ma la decisione di non prendere
nessuna posizione. Cioe' UNA FUGA !
27.05.2010 conversation on youtube
atheists are civilized, instructed and friendly, as soon as you finally finish
to kill each other between Catholics, Protestants, Muslims and
Hebrews we will dominate the earth and burn your books.
Those qualities will not help you at
all until you be not ready to defend them, and so -as an atheist-
you will be the first one hanging down from the crane, 'civilized,
instructed and friendly'...
Ogmios: In any case with a bit of intelligence one
understands the pacific character of the message and testimony of
Christ, Buddha, Krishna and others yet of what great
intelligence and spirituality they were, in a total contrast to the pedofile
Ogmios: Politicians and power hungry 'leaders' abuse of
everything: ideologies, racism, religion for power grip and wars
though this is not the fault of the authentic spiritual teachers
[except of the pedofile barbar which was the false one teacher]. If you mix all this up then you are either lazy
because you consider it too stressing to think down to the roots or
you are stupid.
It is as it is.
Note: The European Project of Atheism is called
Erasmus after Darwin, though Erasmus is deducted from Latin radicare/eradicare
= eradicate, cancel, whip off. So this is people which aim to ERADICATE 2000 YEAR OF EUROPEAN IDENTITY & CULTURE
NATURAL LAWS =
up to the macrocosmos, atomic particles, physical laws, chemical
laws, plants, genetics, galactic laws, planetary laws, universal
laws, fibonacci laws, etc.. follows certain
natural and supranatural laws. The existence of highly intelligent
laws premises the existence of a respective high
intelligent source/origin i/e
intelligence. Laws can not make themselves. The simple existence of laws
requires a creative entity who put them in place.
Alles existierende im Univesum bewegt bzw entfaltet, verändert
oder rückentwickelt sich auf Basis von
Gesetzen die teils
nachweisbar sind, die Menschheit in deren Umfange aber nur zum Teil
begreifen kann. Gesetze setzen bekanntlich
Tutto ciò che esiste segue certe
leggi naturali e sovranaturali.
L'esistenza di un network di leggi
intelligenti premette l'esistenza di [un network] di grande
LAWS DO NOT
LAWS DO NOT
universe from the microcosmos up to the
macrocosmos is wired and being kept
together by highly complex/intelligent
laws. Intelligent laws require respective
intelligent creative entity.
Physical laws are DESCRIPTIVE not
PRESCRIPTIVE. As such they are merely
describing consistent phenomena. Are you
claiming that nothing can be consistent
without some intent making it consistent?
Consider that in a universe where nothing
is consistent no life could evolve, no
intelligence would exist to consider
questions of consistency.
I quote you with "Consider that in a
universe where nothing is consistent no
life could evolve, no intelligence would
exist to consider questions of consistency."
No way! Consistency is a fake. In reality
consistency doesn't exist. In reality
everything existing is ENERGY. NOTHING
consistent. Consistency exists for your
eyes, for our physical senses, which can
perceive only that part of condensed
universe which is vibrating in the
frequency we are currently living in.
Natural laws are of pure prescriptive
nature, while the observer can deduct
certain rules setting up a descriptive
law, trying to predict certain outcomes
which however is seldom successful since
mankind knows only a tiny part of the
whole story. There are laws out there over
which existence mankind hasn't the least
idea. Anyway, I don't see the point. Still
LAWS DO NOT MAKE THEMSELVES.
LAWS DO NOT
LAWS DO NOT
universe from the microcosmos up to the
macrocosmos is wired and being kept
together by highly complex/intelligent
laws. Intelligent laws require respective
intelligent creative entity.
The laws of physics and maths are
determined, and still being determined by
us. WE'RE the intelligent identities using
observable fundamental laws of existence
to explain things. The fact that the
macrocosmos appears to have rules
is merely our observation of reality,
speed is relative to distance and time,
and all other permutations of those 3.
The universe isn't being held together by
laws, the properties OF the
universe are what we observe as laws;
mathematical descriptions of how
What do you want to say, that physical
laws are no longer laws ???
Mankind observes and is trying to put up
mathematical descriptions of those laws
trying to understand them, since they are
far to complex for the mankind's simple
mind. You can't say that laws are no
longer laws for the simple fact that we do
not fully understand them.
"the fact that the universe appears to
APPEARS ? You joking ??? You never heard
about physical laws? gravitational laws,
the correlations between time space and
materia, genetics, fibonacci laws,
chimical laws, simply all non-man made
laws from top to bottom. LAWS DO NOT MAKE
A property is nothing else than a result
of laws. So do not put things upside down
just to keep your vacuum-world alive.
06.05.11- The teams
LAWS DO NOT MAKE THEMSELVES!
This day I got the youtube
notice about an answer left by
another user on some postings
which I posted on a youtube
video several months ago. As I
went back to that video page I
found all numbers belonging to
the video were composed of the
votes: 14 likes 0 dislikes
4214121114, summing up into 21
[everything 1,2 and 4]
GOD's WILL !
oder words: This is the divine
authoritis re-confirmation that universal laws
are nothing else than the
expression of Gods Will, or
GOD's SPOKEN WORD
Here the respective text:
The laws have not
necessarily to be made by
anyone they have been
created by the universe
and thats it.
Well, that's' indeed the
last of the paradoxes I
ever heard. It's like
saying "I was in the rain
without an umbrella
because I'm wet".
CREATION is 'an act or of
order or of chaos.
expression of organization
and therefore of
Since the universe IS
ordered in all its
components, on all levels
and in all the details,
the universe can not be
anything else than an
ACT OF ORDER
absurd theory is that one trying to reduce
everything to a theory of a
QUANTUM MECHANICS &
QUANTUM COLLAPSE STATE
the whole universe
from the microcosmos up to the macrocosmos,
plants, solar systems, EVERYTHING
existing, is wired and being kept together
by highly intelligent laws. Intelligent
laws require respective intelligent and
creative entity. It is impossible for any
honest being to ignore such fundamental
basics like 1+1=2
what evidence do you
have that the laws are intelligent laws
you need to prove that first premise
before you can build your line of logic.
Would you deny that
the universe is organized from the
microcosmos up to the macrocosmos, from
the plants, all living forms, through to
the genetics, interaction of space time
and gravitation, fibonacci etc..
everything is organized and ORGANIZATION
IS EXPRESSION OF INTELLIGENCE.
No it is not. The
organisation is a product of the collapsed
quantum state following the initial
expansion. It is a reflection of what is.
Things are what they are because they got
to be that way. We are made up of organic
molecules because these are common
elements with certain properties that come
from their nature not because god wanted
it to be so. You are making a huge leap
here and your logic is not sound.
Stop putting the
world upside down in the hope to get it
away with your egoism, by saying that laws
are a reflection of their results, this is
naked nonsense which even a kindergarten
child realizes can not work.
The laws are what?
The laws are the product of the universe
cooling. Before it does you can have no
laws for gravity or electromagnetism. The
properties of matter are derived from the
collapsing quantum state that determines
the nature, amount and form of the matter.
Prior to that there can be no laws for
matter as there is no matter. The changes
in the universe create the 4 forces and
how they operate because before that there
is only quantum gravity and super hot
To be honest, I have
never heard such a nonsense. Universe
cooling is the result of respective
universal physical and energetic laws
[this concrete law says that:
expansion = cooling] not
more and not less, but not inverted.
Why you don't try to explain your
demagoguery for instance to any law maker
on this globe. Tell them that their laws
are the product of the results of it...//
then let me know what they answer you.
Most probably they will ask you if you
shouldn't have a visit by the doctor?
The four forces [strong nuclear force,
the electromagnetic force, the weak
nuclear force and the gravitational force]
are part of the universal complex and they
are expression of working energy [energy
is the potential to do work, while work is
a function of force], just as the whole
universe, every single atom, particle, is
finally nothing else than condensed
energy. Tell me: Where is the SOURCE of
that endless amount of ENERGY and of the
ORGANIZING INTELLIGENT LAWS managing all
Quantum mechanics is
a scientifically improvable word gambling
game which is based on pure hypothetical
potential outcomes used to put in question
any real outcome of measurement. This is
the trial to lift science above of itself
by applying pure hypothetic mechanic
theories as a replacement of inexplicable
realities ignoring: will, life, feelings,
heart, soul, emotions,
sense of abstraction, spirituality...This is perverting science,
making a new demagoguery by denying the
most basic principles of life yet putting
upside down cause and effect.
can not make laws, they can only try to
understand the existing one or try to
define them or to find some possible
theories for realities which they can not
explain. In reality there is even not one
single natural law which is even nearly
perfectly defined or definable because
everything is relative and scientists laws
work perfectly only on paper - pure
theory! Even the best of them are all just
approximations from A to Z, let alone
those 'playground theories' like quantum
You say. "Things are
what they are because they got to be that
way." Though our quantum theory without any
organizing universal laws would produce
nothing else than the perfect chaos.
You're not only denying that laws do not
make themselves, but even that
Your theory says for instance that
a human has no chance to resist to its
instincts. I don't know how sick, cold and soulless
an individual must be for such a
flathinker life attitude without any
Before the fucking universe cools to the
point of having matter what are the laws
for matter? Before there is gravity what
is the laws for the conversion of
potential energy to kinetic energy
(something that also cannot fucking well
exist before there is fucking
MATTER!!!!!). These laws do no exist for
the simple reason that the things they
pertain to don't exist. How hard is that
to understand you fucking retard? These
laws are a reflection of the collapsed
the cooling of the universe if not the
physical law. Matter is
condensed and organized energy, according
to the universal laws.
Why you don't simply answer my questions
where the endless amount of energy comes
from and who put all those endless complex
wired organizing laws into place. YOU ???
Finally try to explain the will with your
ENERGY. ENERGY DOES NOT MAKE COMPLEX
ORGANIZING LAWS BUT CAN BE ORGANIZED BY
RESPECTIVE LAWS, AND NOT THE OTHER WAY
Also the law
of expansion=cooling IS A LAW!
THAT FINALLY ACKNOWLEDGE ?!
Fitting Google logo
on this same day
picture name: "firstmaninspace11-hp-js.jpg"
 [hp] [js
The date today = 12.04.11 composed of the
1,2,4 = God's Will
1961 is the year of birth of
Ogmios. In this year the first man left
the earth while the divine spirit came in
though Ogmios Spirit of Truth and the
inspired legion in order to conquer the
mankind's consciousness by persuasion - and will NEVER LEAVE
AGAIN from here.
sinister empty word gambler product:
There is no
such a thing as design, what you see
around you is evolutionary mechanics. That
means nature adapts to its circumstances
in order to achieve certain actions.
These laws that you speak about are not
designed, they are harnessed by constants
Once you understand quantum mechanics you
well understand that laws are constants
(the need) not designs.
Again we are at the level of animals and
even lower. Your theory says for
instance that a human has no chance to
resist to its instincts. Common! No
"need" will ever explain the beauty of a
flower, of a diamond, the passion for
nature, sport, helpfulness, children, or
the fascination one can feel for any
beautiful something. etc?
Anyway, Call it as you want you peace of
evolutionary mechanics flesh, if your
flesh works like this then it does it
according to respective laws. WHO makes
those laws YOU peace of flesh ???
people for stupid!
Ogmios- biblical Spirit of Truth 01.07.11
fisica quantistica. Se non sanno nemmeno
cosa sia luce, se sia un elemento di
consistenza o solo di onde figuiriamoci se
sanno cosa sia Dio e la creazione, Pero
gli stessi 'scienziati' atei demagoghi del
vacuum erano all'altezza della scoperta
che gli ebrei siano una razza inferiore da
estirpare e hanno fatto i servili auitanti
dei tiranni piu' sanguinosi che questo
mondo abbia mai visto.
SEPARA SPIRITUALITA [religione autentica]
DA SCIENZA [EVOLUZIONE] E 'COME UNO DI
QUESTI BAMBINI O demagoghi che trovando
l'acqua in una conchiglia credono di aver
La meccanica quantistica è un gioco di
parole scientificamente indimostrabile,
che si basa su dei possibili [potenziali]
risultati puramente ipotetici utilizzati
per mettere in discussione qualsiasi
risultato di misura del reale. Questo è
l'ennesima tentazione della 'scienza' atea
di sollevarsi sopra di se stessi mediante
l'applicazione di teorie meccaniche
puramente ipotetiche come sostituto delle
realta' scientificamente inspiegabili, ma
oltretutto ignorando i vettori della vita
sentimenti,cuore, anima, emozioni,
senso di astrazione, spiritualità ...
pervertire la scienza, facendo una nuova
demagogia negando l'esistenza delle leggi
universali che non si fanno da soli ma
sono frutto del creatore!
Che morale ha un quantum, e da dove la
prendi TU la morale.
biblical Spirit of Truth 22.07.11
tubed and added on
tend to put in doubt the existence of the
We all know
that biology, experiences, conditioning
play a role in our decisions. That is good
as it is since mankind is in a process of
evolution though learning. That doesn't
mean that we are soul- spirit yet
will-less machines. What a
misunderstanding of the human metaphysics! Certainly
the degree of free will depends on the
individuals maturity and personality, that
means the final parameter is and remains
the free will. Or would you
seriously state that a human with a strong
will has no chance to resist to its
consists in believing what is beyond the
power of reason to believe. It is not
enough for a thing be possible to be
GESETZ = AUSDRUCK
Auszug aus einer Diskussion mit einem Atheisten: "Gesetz
setzt Intelligenz voraus. Da man die Tatsache der Existenz
von natürlichen/universellen Gesetzmäßigkeiten in schier
unendliche Form und Komplexität nicht leugnen kann, kann
man auch die Intelligenz die dahintersteht nicht leugnen.
Nennen darfst du sie wie du willst, aber Intelligenz
leugnen ist halt per se kein Ausdruck von Intelligenz, und
das meine ich nicht angreifend auch wenn es unter
Umständen so rüberkommen sollte."
Atheism in the sense of 'free of orientation' is no
solution. Atheism does not give sense to your life.
Atheism can not give ANY answer on ANY of the
'cardinal questions' of your life.
No, Atheism answer that "cardinal questions" in a
different way. Atheism is based on evidences. Get over
it. Try to be less narrow minded and more respectful,
Prove me that the sky is
blue and if you come with the lights wave length then
prove me that light exists and so on. FORGET THE EVIDENCE!
The only evidence existing is your character and your
values. What character and what values can give you
atheism except of evidence which doesn't exist.
Atheism is against the believe in
the higher values of your life, and so it paves the way to
wicked minded ideologies like nazism, communism or Islam.
This is why atheism is somehow even a danger. The only good thing in atheism
is: It can put you into a position do to your own
independent research for the truth. Unfortunately only
very few atheists go this way. Far too few. The others
There is no need to be religious
in order to have values.
Depends about what "values" you are talking. And even if
you have 'christian' values rather than capitalistic or
leninistic or islamic one, it does not mean that it would
hurt to believe in something higher, rather it will help
you to not lose the track.
REQUIRES "EVIDENCE" FOR SPIRIT
In response to an atheist requiring
a "rational evidence" for the existence of spirit here my
There exists no evidence. For
nothing. Prove me that the sky is blue, and if you come
with the lights wave length then prove me that light
exists and so on. As you can be fanatic demagogue you can
be or become a fanatic rationalist. Both of them are
basically fascists in their mind. I am really sorry to
have rattled your short sighted constructions of the
fascism of rationalism. Indeed you are more near to Hitler
than anyone other. There is enough so called "RATIONAL
EVIDENCE" against the Jews being the guilty one. Right
THREE WAYS OF LIFE
you believe in the right principles [Jesus Christ,
Buddha, Krishna etc]
2nd wayyou believe in no principles [Atheism]
3rd wayyou believe in the wrong principles [ideologies like islam
The second way opens the door to the third one.
YOUTUBE CONVERSATION 29.09.2010
Atheism is a term which has to be defined. If Atheism is
godlesness [means a life without any higher principles]
then Atheism is the door to the ideological plague like islam, nazism, fascism, communism. NEVER a person which
actually believes in the Spirit of Christ could become a
despot like Hitler etc... NEVER !!!
spoken, atheism is just the rejection of a belief in the
existence of a deity. While theism is the belief of the
existence of a deity. An atheist would get his morals from
compassion, empathy, common sense ...the culture they are
brought up in and personal views. Theists typically take
their morals from a book, because god told them so...and
if they do not comply, they will burn in hell.
speaking of course
At this point we are entering in pure philosophical word
plays. Who has ever shown us more compassion, empathy,
common sense than Jesus Christ? Name also Krishna, Buddha and others. So, who ever has those values has God
and in a degree in which he has [and lives!] them. Anyway,
it will not hurt to believe in something higher even far
beyond of our understanding and open your ears for its
ways to bring us spiritual food step by step the portion
mankind is able do digest in its respective status of
evolution/development. Indeed it will not only not hurt,
it will even help you to keep on track, think about.
that everyone has got a brain in order to use it, not in
order to ignore it.
ASK AND YOU
SHALL RECEIVE > is one of the eternal universal
laws. However, who prefers to run around blindly, shall
run around blindly or hide behind letters. Its his own
choice. The problem is that inactive mind becomes stupid
and at some point the blind one will start do accuse the
others for his mistakes consequences. Then it becomes a
real problem. This is what we are experiencing today with
islam which prohibits to the individual to become a free
thinker and doer, in contrast to Christianity, where
Christ himself told us: "you
will do greater things than I" >
is a product of secularist civilization, and it was not
achieved thanks to Christianity, but in spite of it.
Islam worships Ala, who is the same abrahamic god, the
same chimera of the Old Testament, a book of Christianity
as well. Still, you are free to utter your gloriously
Secularist civilization is fruit of Christian CIVILization.
You don't know that CHRIST [which was the first human
ever nailed onto the cross for FREE SPEECH] was a
civilist, the same as me - Spirit of Truth - predicted by
Christ 2000 years ago. You don't know that across the
globe only in societies based on the Christian spirit a
progressive society with functioning democracy, free
markets and civilism has ever developed? You don't know
that a couple of years ago, after fatwa's and murders
against Rudi Carell, Salman Rhusdy, Van Gogh and others
when you cowards were hiding behind the curtains we the
truthfuls were the first one who went out on you tube with
the sword of the word, to confront the islam plague on their
own channels, fighting for and defending our FREE SPEECH,
braking down the monstrous wall of fear, taboo and
demagoguery, at the price of uncountable life threatening
posts, emails, text messages in my box. I have never
hidden my address or anything. Though where have YOU been
at that time? Behind the curtains! And now YOU want to
tell me that free speech is YOUR fruit ?
..find all facts and answers in
regard to Allah the pagan moon-god
DID YOU KNOW?
constitution - the first democracy of this world- has
been sworn in by its founding father [like Benjamin
Franklin, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Marin
Luther, Benjamin Rush, etc ... ] on the BIBLE!
The founders of the democratic CIVILization
have NOT been Atheists, ...[as they likely tend to
believe, trying to lift themselves up above all
non-atheists] ...but have been
The first declaration of human rights in mankind's history is to be found
in the old testament:
God said, ‘Let Us[*] make man in Our image, according
to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of
the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the
cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping
thing that creeps on the earth.’”
[*]The plural is a
reference to the Trinity; but also an attempt to avoid
the idea of an immediate resemblance of humans [as a
fallen part of creation] to God.
So this is the holy
declaration that every person, man or woman, is
created in Godfathers image, without any restriction,
neither for race nor gender nor the intelligence nor
the faith. This scripture has been described as the
greatest revolutionary statement and has without any
doubt changed the world fundamentally. God bestows to
man the greatest conceivable dignity: God's image.
Everyone has a right, therefore, that this dignity is
respected. And every state has a duty to protect that
dignity by laws and may enforce by legal means. This
universal declaration of human dignity includes also
the individual freedom. Now dignity in Islam has
likely a contrarian meaning than in the Christian
or other authentic religious spirits So, for the
right interpretation/definition of the [emptied]
terms like "dignity" Jesus Christ has given example
along with the author of the present pages to fill
those words with the
living word for the third millennium.
Everything that helps to bring an individual [incarnated spirit] forward is to be defined as worthy
[=dignity]. In the case of a mass murder or sinister
dictator and his functionaries, this can even be the
death penalty, because it will be the only act able to
awake a repentance in such obsessed individuals.
Repentance however is the first step toward healing.
And healing is dignity.
allererste universelle Erklärung der Menschenrechte
finden wir im Alten Testament in 1. Mose 1,26-27: „Gott
schuf den Menschen nach seinem Bilde, nach dem Bilde
Gottes schuf er ihn, als Mann und Frau schuf er sie.”
Gott erklärt also, dass jeder Mensch, Mann oder Frau,
nach seinem Bild geschaffen ist, und zwar ohne
jegliche Einschränkung, weder der Rasse noch des
Geschlechts noch der Intelligenz noch des Glaubens.
Dieser Bibeltext ist als die größte revolutionäre
Aussage bezeichnet worden. Keine Frage: Dieser Satz
hat die Welt grundlegend verändert. Gott spricht dem
Menschen die größte denkbare Würde zu:
Gottesebenbildlichkeit. Jeder Mensch hat daher ein
Recht darauf, dass diese Würde respektiert wird. Und
jeder Staat hat die Pflicht, diese Würde durch Gesetze
zu schützen und unter Umständen mit rechtsstaatlichen
Mitteln durchzusetzen. Diese universelle Erklärung der
Würde des Menschen beinhaltet zugleich seine
[Pastor Adel Fouad on
Epicurus Epikur? Was
hat ein Epikur ausser in schöne Worte verpackt denn
grossartiges vorgelebt? Welche revolutionären Prinzipien
des zwischenmenschlichen Daseins hat er durch sein eigenes
Beispiel lebendig gemacht?
Tell me, beyond of nice sounding but empty words what kind
of extraordinary life example has Epicurus given to the
Note: Christianity deducts
the word CHRIST not from Church nor Bible or clergy or anything
else! Anyway, one thing does not exclude the other, though
there is no compulsion. So, Christian culture or spirit - in its basic
definition includes everything which has the core of
humanism and civilization within.
Note: Pre-Christian Greek
"Democracy"?: The old Greek invented the
word democracy, not more not less. Modern definition of
democracy means the rule of the folks, that does not apply
to the Greek model, with extra rights reserved to a
privileged cast only, while the folks and even women had
no votes, which is not in the spirit of humanism. Though
democracy without humanism is no democracy. You can't lift
democracy [which is just a structure e/o a result] above
humanism [which is the spirit, groundwork, foundation].
How can a structure be legitimated without its foundation.
While the definition of humanism is very clear and
unmistakable. There is no higher way than that one of
Christ > , HE the greatest humanist
ever, who has risen
PRE-CHRISTIAN GREEK DEMOCRACY
Posting of Anonym on
Hitler was a christian
Answer Ogmios on youtube:
Maybe Hitler was catholic,
but then he was ATHEIST catholic. In other words he was
catholic on the paper but ATHEIST in his mind.
Certainly Hitler was NOT A
If you claim the contrary,
then tell me what Hitler and Jesus Christ had in common,
or stop your populist lies.
The definition of
CHRISTIANITY is not deducted from church nor from bible or
clergy, but from CHRIST !
A part of
that Hitler was a murderer of priests. Nazis removed the
crucifiXes from schools, and he admired islam pest.
Keep that in mind one time
for ever and stop justify the abuse of the spirit of
Christ hiding behind some 3rd degree sentences of the
historicized old testament
well knowing that the new
testament standing on the pillar of the living word of
Jesus Christ represents the primary guideline of
before the letter of the law but violate the heart of the
law" [Jesus Christ the Great Genius, speaking over the
word gambler wolves like you.
Zitat Adolf Hitler
bei Poitiers nicht Karl Martell gesiegt: — das
Christentum ist so etwas Fades —, so hätten wir viel
eher noch den Mohammedanismus übernommen, diese
Lehre der Belohnung des Heldentums: Der Kämpfer
allein hat den siebenten Himmel! Die Germanen hätten
die Welt damit erobert, nur durch das Christentum
sind wir davon abgehalten worden“:
Hitler Monologe im Führerhauptquartier“ 28.08.1942)
HITLER & JIHAD PRINCIPLE
scrap222666 wrote on youtube:
example. Hitler actually used the Jihad principle to start
the war. If you study it Hitler got the people to support
this war by using propaganda how "Polish Germans are
subhuman and oppressed" and they must defend them. So it
was a defensive action for the people. Same way some
Muslims are fighting western oppression of Islam and
America as a "defensive" act and Jihad. How is this
concept any different? This "defence" is still very attack
"Man ist entweder
Christ oder Deutscher. Beides geht nicht"
Konfessionen, ob nun diese oder jene: Das ist alles
gleich. Das hat keine Zukunft mehr. Für die
Deutschen jedenfalls nicht. Der italienische
Faschismus mag in Gottes Namen seinen Frieden mit
der Kirche machen. Ich werde das auch tun. Warum
nicht? Das wird mich nicht abhalten, mit Stumpf und
Stil, mit allen seinen Wurzeln und Fasern das
Christentum in Deutschland auszurotten (...) Man ist
entweder Christ oder Deutscher. Beides kann man
nicht sein (...).
Wir beenden einen Irrweg der Menschheit. Die Tafeln
vom Berg Sinai haben ihre Gültigkeit verloren. Das
Gewissen ist eine jüdische Erfindung. Es ist wie die
Beschneidung, eine Verstümmelung des menschlichen
Wesens. Eine neue Zeit der magischen Weltdeutung
kommt herauf, der Deutung aus dem Willen und nicht
aus dem Wissen. Der christlichen Lehre von der
unendlichen Bedeutung der menschlichen Einzelseele
und der persönlichen Verantwortung setze ich mit
eiskalter Klarheit die erlösende Lehre von der
Nichtigkeit und Unbedeutendheit des einzelnen
Menschen und seines Fortlebens in der sichtbaren
Unsterblichkeit der Natur gegenüber. An die Stelle
des Dogmas vom stellvertretenden Leiden und Sterben
eines göttlichen Erlösers tritt das stellvertretende
Leben und Handeln des neuen Führergesetzgebers, das
die Masse der Gläubigen von der Last der freien
27.11.10 mit Dank an yoububer
Interessante, intelligente Inhalte zum Thema bei
und Handeln"CH. >
"You be either
Christian or German. Both can not be."
"With the confessions its with all the same. This
has no future. At least not for the Germans. The
Italian fascism, in the name of God, might make his
peace with the Church. I will do this too. Why not?
That will not stop me eradicate Christianity
in Germany down to the roots and fibers(...) You are
either Christian or a German. Both can not be (...).
We put an end to the wrong path of humanity. The
tablets from Mount Sinai have lost their validity.
Conscience is a Jewish invention. It's like
circumcision, a mutilation of human being. A new era
of the magical world view comes up, the
interpretation out of the will and not out of
knowledge. The Christian doctrine of the infinite
importance of the individual human soul and personal
responsibility, I confront it with icy clarity by
the saving teaching of the nothingness and
insignificance of the individual and his survival
within an apparently immortal nature. In place of
the dogma of vicarious suffering and death of a
divine Redeemer enters the living and acting Führer-lawmaker,
which releases the mass of the faithful from the
burden of free choice. "
Provided on 27.11.10 by
"O sei Cristiano
o sei Tedesco. Emtrambe e' impossibile."
Hitler aveva le immagianzioni di diventare un
profeta destinato di eradicare gli ebrei. Ha fatto
vere e proprie prediche rispettive usando il
vocabolario rispettivo come se fosse un papa in
guerra. Ma questo non ti permette di conforndere il
Socialismo nazionale con religione. Invece questo
succede con l'islam. Perche la gente e' ignorante,
non riesce a distinguere il bianco dal nero, la
verita dalla bugia, l'onesto dall abusatore.
"Con le confessioni e' con tutte lo stesso dilemma.
Questo non ha futuro. Almeno non per i tedeschi. Il
fascismo italiano, in nome di Dio, potrebbe fare la
sua pace con la Chiesa. E cosi' farò anch' io.
Perché no? Questo non mi fermerà di sradicare il
cristianesimo in Germania giu' fino alle radici e le
fibre (...) O sei cristiano o sei tedesco. Entrambe
e' impossibile (...).
[citazione Adolf Hitler]
HITLER BELIEVED IN GOD ?
I've not once
said he was a Christian.
BELIEVE IN GOD THOUGH AS STATED IN MANY OF HIS
SPEECHES AND HIS BOOK.
His speeks and
his books are full of empty words which have
even not the value of a cent. Hilter knew
PERFECTLY that he would need religion for his
power purposes exactly as the pedophile bloody
it knew. WHO EVER believes in God will follow
the examples of the highest teachers this
globe has seen from Christ to Buddha to
Krishna and others. All other with the bloody
hands are nothing than gambles bastards.
abusing of them. WHAT ELSE.
I mean... do you have a brain cell to be used
by your own, or are you forced to blindly
believe even the word of a bastard like
Hitler without questioning them for
mit uns" [God with us] of Hitler has the same value of the 'Islam
is religion of peace".
Hitler was trying to find a way to become an
Arian messiah. He was desperately trying to
construct a respective [false] story. Herefore he
abused of both Christianity and Buddhism, Himmler
even studied Hinduism. One of the myths they tried
to construct is that the Arian race originated from
Tibet. For this purpose they sent a delegation
to Tibet with the task to find some [falsified]
connections/proofs. This is why they chose the
Buddhist swastika buddha as the Nazi symbol. As
Hitler realized the 'Asia construction' would not
work out, he changed tactics and tried to sell
himself as a Christian-type prophet. Tibetan rituals
were reinterpreted as originally Christian one. He
respective speeches using respective vocabulary, as
if he was a war pope. So, although Hitler was
less successful [he wasn't enough hypocrite for this
kind of business] with those plans, he tried exactly the same
as Mohammed, trying to make of himself a prophet and
blood thirsty slaughterer and imperator in one [A
Christ and an Antichrist in one!]. Both of
them [Hitler and Mohammed] were the same PERFECT GODLESS CREATURES =
ATHEISTS ABUSER PACK. YOU ROOTLESS GODLESS ATHEIST
GAMBLERS must finally stop to abuse of EVERYTHING
"Mit einer beachtlichen Fülle
von neuen Quellen aus
Archiven und NS-Schriften weisen Victor und Victoria
Trimondi nach, dass der Nationalsozialismus nicht
nur eine "politische Bewegung" war, sondern dass er
zunehmend in eine "politische Religion"
transformiert werden sollte. Namhafte faschistische
Kulturwissenschaftler ebenso wie obskure Okkultisten
diskutierten vor allem in Heinrich Himmlers SS-Ahnenerbe
offen darüber, wie das Dritte Reich "metaphysisch"
zu verankern sei.
Dabei blickten sie mit Faszination in
den Osten: In den Philosophien,
Mythologien, Visionen und Dogmen, in den
sakralen Praktiken -- darunter die
Kalachakra-Riten -- und Texten der
spirituellen Traditionen Asiens glaubten
sie, "Orientierungen" für eine "Verherrlichung
des Krieges", für die "Apotheose des
Führers" und für die "Vergöttlichung der
arischen Rasse" entdeckt zu haben."
tubed on 18.12.10
As a godless
[SINISTER] individual [Atheist] you live in a world
of perfect confusion. You don't know the difference
between religion and church, you don't know the
difference between religion and ideology, not to
mention that an atheist has no tangent, that means
your words are without any value because
meaningless, empty, everyone can fill them just as
What it means:
You waste your time.Keep in mind one thing. Authentic religion bases on
the living peaceful example of the authentic
archetypes and can NEVER be the reason for
violence. But its YOU SINISTER GODLESS BASTARDS who
abuse of it as you abuse of EVERYTHING,
nationalism, socialism, religion FOR YOUR GODLESS
UNSCRUPULOUS SELFISH PURPOSES. Afterward you can
hide and say it wasn't me, it was the religion. Even
Hitler himself openly admitted to be a SINISTER one
on the idea of the NSDAP we are the German leftists.
[...] nothing we hate more than the dester liberals
and privatists.” – Joseph Goebbels
Ogmios posting from 17.12.10]
Mehr zu diesem Thema
Hitler cercava di trovare
un modo per diventare un
messia ariano. Cercava disperatamente di costruire
una rispettiva storia [falsa] abusando di entrambi
cristianesimo ed il buddismo, Himmler ha anche
studiato l'induismo. Uno dei miti che hanno cercato
di costruire è che la razza ariana originasse dal
sud dell'Asia. Per questo scopo hanno inviato piu'
di una delegazione in Tibet con il compito di
trovare [falsificati] connessioni/prove. Questo è il
motivo per il quale hanno scelto il buddha svastica
come simbolo nazista. Quando Hitler realizzava che
la 'costruzione Asia' non avrebbe funzionata, ha
cambiato tattica e ha cercato di vendersi come
profeta cristiano sempre incaricato da Dio di
eradicare gli ebrei. Ha tenuto discorsi rispettivi
usando il vocabolario rispettivo, come se fosse un
papa in guerra. Così Hitler ha seguito esattamente
le stesse strategie di Maometto, anche se con molto
meno successo. Entrambi erano le stesse CREATURE
ATEE [!!] ABUSANDO DI RELIGIONE!
Nun erfährt man aber in Goebbels "Tagebuch"
(II. 14), daß es,...
Hitler verriet, nach einem Endsieg des
Dritten Reichs allen "konservativen"
Kräften, vor allem dem Christentum, an
den Kragen gegangen wäre.
Es war schließlich, wie Dahrendorf sagte,
die Moderne, die 1933 in Deutschland
ihren Einzug gefeiert hatte, während die
Rechte, die "Reaktion" am 20. Juli 1944
das so linke "Rad der Geschichte"
zurückdrehen wollte, was aber leider
ATHEISM = THE LACK OF
A BENIGN LIFE EXAMPLE/ARCHETYPE
TO BE FOLLOWED
TYRANNY = FRUIT OF
Its you atheist egoistic godless soulless
people on your endless egotrip who led the
world into all disasters from Hitler to Stalin
from Kim Yong to Mohammed, even though some of
your sinister staff abused of definitions
like "religion" or of the names of the
authentic heavens teachers for their unholy
purposes of power and misery unscrupulous
egoism. SHAME SHAME SHAME !!!
There has never been a single instance where
a leader has lead a genocide on the basis of
The facts tell the exact contrary.
NEVER any person which TRULY believes in the
spirit of Christ, or Buddha or Krishna, or in
their "God" or simply in their benign life
example can or will become a barbaric tyrant
of the stamp of a Hitler, Kim Yong, Saddam,
Mohammed, Stalin, Pol Pot etc etc etc. THOSE
BARBARIANS AND TYRANTS ARE INSIDE ALL
> UNSCRUPULOUS ATHEISTS AND POPULISTS !!! and
as if this would not be enough some of those
bastards after all even abuse of the names of
the great authentic spiritual teachers.
Year old boy tortured to death [
DATE 06.01.12 =
years old boy
the same as the spirit of Antichrist
are both manifestations of the
godlessness leading to the slow but
sure giving up your principles,
ending in the loss of sensibility,
shame and scruples, finally
WHICH IS THE FACE OF DEATH,
THE ENEMY OF LIFE
inside the individual are so slow
[creeping] that the individual
itself does not realize what is
going on with it. No old excuses
with the middle age church burning
witches. The church was part of the
middle age but not vice versa.
Everyone knows that he who follows
Spirit of Christ can and
will never and never again end in
barbarianism. It is UNTHINKABLE!
NOTHING ELSE THAN
GIU I CROCIFISSI?
E allora cosa proponi per la
pace, l'ateismo, la filosofia del nulla e niente?
proprio voi individui senza
spirito che avete portato i disastri piu grandi
sull'umanita', da Hitler, a Mohammed, da Lenin a
Saddam da Pol Pot a KimYong tutti creature senza
spirito della verita' ma
GENTE SENZA DIO, ATEI DELLA BUGIA!
Sie beschäftigen sich täglich mit den kleinsten
Bausteinen der Materie. Stellen Sie sich auch die
Frage: Was dahinter steckt? Anders gefragt: Glauben
Sie an einen Gott?
Ich suche wissenschaftliche Antworten auf solche
Ich glaube nicht an
einen Gott. Für mich ist die Natur an sich
faszinierend genug. Bei der Religion – zumindest bei
der katholischen – spielt die Ethik, also das
moralische Verhalten des Menschen, eine große Rolle.
Ich brauche aber keinen Gott oder eine Kirche, der
mir ständig sagt, was für ein moralisches Verhalten
richtig ist und welches nicht.
Man muss es selber wissen.
Warum wisst ihr
es dann nicht.
was nützt vermeintliches "Wissen" ohne Charakter,
vermeintliche "Fakten" die dem menschenfeindlichen
Mißbrauch preisgegeben werden und
vermeintliches "Gutsein" im Dienste des
heuchlerische Scham- u. Skrupellosigkeit.
In Wahrheit kratzt die
menschliche Wissenschaft nur an der Oberfläche.
Von den WAHREN "Gottesteilchen"; also jenen die die
WAHRHEIT von der LÜGE zu unterscheiden wissen, seid
ihr in eurer Welt ohne Prinzip so weit entfernt wie
ein Kamel vom Nordpol, während dem der das Prinzip
hat, in seiner geistigen Heimat alles Wissen des
Universums zu Füßen liegt ]
STOL: They deal daily with the smallest
components of matter.
Do you consider
the question: what is
behind it? In other words: Do
you believe in a God?
Dissertori: I am looking for scientific
answers to such questions. I do not believe in
God. For me, nature is
enough fascinating in itself.
In religion - at least for the Catholic - plays the
ethics, the moral behavior of man, a great role.
However, I need no God or a church that tells me
constantly what moral behavior
and what not. You have to know
Quoted from STOL.it
why then you do not know it.
what good is supposed "knowledge" without character,
what good are
which are disclosed to the
inhuman abuse and to the
alleged "goodness" in the service
and masked unscrupulousness. In
the human science barely scratches the surface. From
the REAL "god particles"
thus from those which are able
to distinguish between
- you are in your world
without the principle as far away as a camel from the
North Pole, while to him
who the principle has, in its
spiritual home all knowledge
of the universe lies at
Essence of religion
How to save civilization
Free market & politics
Journey of rejuvenation
The key for revolution
Avoid the worst case
Messages fr.middle reign
!Butterfly of truth
Heaven's QUALITY message
Capital VX Corruption
Show must go on
Actual things of life
Time for making choice
One picture all
A great FAMILY
Love is CHANGE
Who Has Ears
Building new CIVILization