Mohammed gave
permission to kill women and children in war: It is reported on
the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah
(may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children
of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said:
"They are from them." (Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4321)
Muhammad
ONLY NEEDED
TO
HEAR
Muslims SAY
Muhammad was illiterate
and there were no Arabic translations of the
Holy Bible during the time of Muhammad.
R. Saadias Gaon first translated the OT into
Arabic in 900 AD. Furthermore, a man named
Erpenius first translated the NT into Arabic
in 1616.
Ok,,,please read on
Muhammad ONLY
NEEDED TO HEAR these stories ORALLY for
borrowing to take place. After hearing these
stories Muhammad revised them to suit his
theological presuppositions and then tried to
pass them off as revelation from God.
[..] Dabei wird
herauskommen, dass der Islam auf einen
einzigen Araber zurückgeht, der noch dazu von
den Juden und Christen in Mekka als “Lügner”
und “Betrüger” bezeichnet wurde. Mohammed
konnte bekanntlich weder lesen noch schreiben,
und er gab Geschichten aus der Bibel und der
Thora verfälscht wieder – die ihm wiederum
erzählt worden waren – um sie in seine neue
“Religion” einzubauen. Dann behauptete er
seinerseits, Christen und Juden hätten ihre
Schriften verfälscht und forderte von ihnen,
seine Sichtweise als die Wahre anzuerkennen.
[..]
The
Malignant Narcissicist and his Grand Delusion Allah
by Sujit
Das
[..] When
the Muslims look at the prosperity of Western world
and look at their pitiable condition they are
ashamed. They need a way out. The best way out is to
put all the blame on the infidels.
For a Narcissist this is easy. They know how to live
in deception. Ever since the birth of Islam, the
Muslims live in deception.
At the beginning,
Muhammad deceived them, then the early rulers of
Islam deceived them and finally Muslims have learnt
to deceive themselves. Today it had become a second
nature to them.
Creativity
is a skill that should be developed. It is a natural
potential which is incompatible with external and
internal rewards or punishments. The Muslim society
is so much superstitious that this natural potential
of individual Muslims are subdued. It has disastrous
consequences. As Shapiro & Purpel (2008, p. 430)
wrote,
“Whenever
this creativity is impeded, the ultimate result is
not simply the absence of creativity, but an actual
positive presence of destructiveness”.
However, it
would be wrong to think that Muslims’ destructive
tendency is completely a result of subdued
creativity. Another important factor is abnormal
hate. Muslims hate the Jews, Christians, Atheists,
Idolaters – practically every non-Muslim. Then there
is internal hate. Sunnis and Shiaa sects hate each
other. The Ahmadiyyas are hated by both Sunnis and
Shiaa sects.
Kurds are
hated by some other sects. There are hundreds of
sects in Islam. There is tremendous hate and
distrust amongst different sects. How do we explain
this?This type of hate we cannot see in any culture. USA
had nuked Japan in 1945 causing large numbers of
deaths and occupied their land for a long time.
British occupied India causing great suffering.
During Nazi regime, the Germans had caused much
destruction to other nations; but, today hatred
towards USA is not found in Japan, Hindus no more
cherish any malice against the British and Germans
are not hated by those nations whom Nazis had
attacked. Every culture had forgotten the past and
now works together for a better future. Why Muslims
are different?It is because; Muhammad’s narcissism works in the
diseased minds of Muslims. The deep hatredoriginated from Muhammad. Since the members of
Jewish faith are most vulnerable amongst all, we
take the Jews as example to find out the actual
reason of Muslims’ hate towards Jews today and how
it originated.Muhammad
originally described himself as a Jews’ Prophet. To
impress the Jews, heincorporated many aspects of Judaism within it and
accordingly Allah revealed many versesfavorable to them. But when Muhammad demanded that
the Jews abandon their own faith andconvert to Islam, the Jews declined. With this
Muhammad was furious to them and this is the
starting point of deep hatred and enmity. When the
Jews rejected Muhammad, his false self felt
deflected and his narcissistic balloon got
punctured. So he strengthened his self-image by
diminishing, humiliating or degrading the Jews.Now the
question is, by hating the Jews today, after several
hundred of years of Muhammad’s death, what Muslims
are achieving? Today, Jews-bashing is a political
game played by many Muslim nations who have got
nothing to do with Israel. Many state controlled
newspapers of Muslim nations are full of anti-Jews
propaganda. So, this doubt needs to be clarified.
Muhammad had invaded the personality of the Muslims
and paralyzed their true selves. This evil Prophet
is still living through the lives of his followers.
By occupying the Muslim minds, Muhammad made them
compatible with his own disorder and secured their
submission. After this he made them do what he
always dreamt of doing, what he often desired, what
he constantly feared of. He compelled them into
collaborating in the expression of the repressed
side of his personality. The whole Muslim Ummah
is a narcissistic supply machine of Muhammad and
every individual Muslim is an essential part of it.
With deep hatred in his heart, every Muslim, even
today, is trying to re-inflate Muhammad’s false ego,
his narcissistic balloon which was punctured by
those early Jews. With every hateful activity
directed towards the Jews, Muslims are still
securing narcissistic supply sources to their
Prophet. Muhammad is still consuming the
narcissistic supply flowing through these human
conduits of his own making. [..]
In
seinem ersten Band mit dem Titel “Das Leben und die
Lehre des Mohammad” beschrieb Sprenger 1862 die
Krankheit des Propheten:
Nach dem Arzt Johann Lukas Schönlein (1793-1864)
tritt die Krankheit gewöhnlich in Paroxysmen auf.
Wenn der Anfall leicht ist, zeigt sich ein Schwanken
zwischen Expansion und Contraction der Muskeln. Die
Lippen und Zunge zittern, als wollten sie etwas
auflecken. Die Augen verdrehen sich für einige Zeit
nach der einen und dann nach der anderen Seite und
der Kopf bewegt sich automatisch. Bei leichten
Anfällen ist der Wille mächtig genug diese
convulsiven Bewegungen zu beherrschen. Aber bei
heftigeren Anfällen sind sie vom Einfluss des
Willens los getrennt. Zugleich stellen sich
Kopfschmerzen ein, und wenn die Paroxysmen sehr
heftig sind, erfolgt Katalepsie: Mohammed fiel wie
betrunken zu Boden, sein Gesicht wurde rot, der Atem
schwer, und er schnarchte „wie ein Kamel“. Es
scheint aber nicht, dass er das Bewusstsein verlor.
Insofern unterschieden sich seine Anfälle von
Epilepsie. Gleich nach diesen „Engelsbesuchen“
wusste er stets den Umstehenden eine Offenbarung
mitzuteilen. Auch wenn diese Orakel manchmal sehr
lahm waren, so bewiesen sie doch immerhin, dass er
bei voller Besinnung gewesen.
Diese Krankheit beginnt etwa im Alter von 40 Jahren.
Mit circa 60 sterben die meisten Patienten. Es passt
ins Krankheitsbild, dass Mohammed stark schwitzte,
sich deshalb oft wusch und den Geruch mit Düften von
Muskat, Ambergris und Weihrauch überdeckte. Weil die
Hypophysis (pituitary) die Fruchtbarkeit beeinflusst,
reduzierte die Acromegalie seine Spermienproduktion
ganz beträchtlich.Deshalb
konnten all die Frauen und Sklavinnen seines Harems
ihm nur einen Sohn gebären, der früh starb. Wenn der
Tumor auf die dritte Ventrikel (Zwischenhöhle im
Gehirn) und auf die Verbindungsstelle der Augennerven
drückt, können die Patienten Halluzinationen erleiden. Auch seine
körperlichen Eigenarten deuten auf Acromegalie hin:
Seine Haut war seltsam rosa, seine Stimme eigenartig,
sein Gang tapsig: „Er ging wie jemand, der einen Hügel
herab kommt“. Er hatte große Hände, Füße, Ohren, eine
lange fleischige Nase und auffällige Augenbrauen.
Mohammeds Tod passt ins Krankheitsbild. Er starb mit
heftigen Kopfschmerzen, vermutlich durch eine Blutung
des Hypophysen-Tumors. Acromegalie ist eine seltene,
sich langsam auswirkende physische Krankheit,
[..]
Nach Sichtung der literarischen Quellen kann man zu
dem Ergebnis kommen, dass Mohammed an einer
chronischen, paranoid-halluzinatorischen Schizophrenie
erkrankt war. Bei schizophrenen Psychosen verwischen
sich die Grenzen zwischen Realität und individueller
Wahrnehmung. [..]
Allah
ist keineswegs ein externer Gott, sondern Teil der
offensichtlich gespaltenen Persönlichkeit des
Propheten. Die Offenbarungen sind kein Zufluss aus
einer göttlichen Quelle – der verborgene Allah spricht
aufgrund einer wahrscheinlich schizophrenen Psychose
aus dem Ich Mohammeds.
Der Prophet
und Allah sind identisch, sind vereint in der Person
Mohammed. Das bedeutet für die Lehre den Verlust der
göttlichen Autorität. Eine Erkenntnis, die nicht weg
zu diskutieren ist, die gleichsam die Axt anlegt an
das islamische System. Damit bricht das Kartenhaus der
Moslems zusammen.
Auch
wenn es noch dauert, die zunehmende Bildung, die
Erkenntnis der Zusammenhänge und der wachsende Drang
zur persönlichen Freiheit werden dazu führen, dass der
Islam beerdigt werden kann, auf dem Friedhof der
großen Irrtümer der Menschheitsgeschichte.
»
Die islamische Ideologie – archaisch, totalitär und
naiv gläubig | Von Bert Conrados |
Epubli
Verlagsgruppe Holtzbrinck
| Softcover | DIN A5 hoch | 256 Seiten s/w | ISBN:
978-3-8442-1200-6 Deutsch | Erscheinungsdatum:
21.10.2011 Preis: 18,90 €
If you are a Moslem and you are doing what Mohammed
said, you are being moderate.
These are facts which we are going to have to deal
with, because we are going to have to engage islam not
on opinions. We do not need opinion based reasoning.
We need fact based reasoning.
And we need people who stand up not for the
oppressors, but for the victims[..]"
Gibt
es etwas, was Ihnen am Koran besonders sympathisch ist?
Nagel:
Ich muss gestehen, ich habe nie darüber nachgedacht,
was mir am Koran gefallen könnte. Was ich sympathisch
finde – wenn man von der Theorie weggeht, der Koran
sei Gotteswort –, ist die zum Teil erstaunliche
Offenheit, in der Mohammed sich und seine Interessen
darstellt und sich damit selbst entblößt. [Tilman Nagel
- Professor für Arabistik und Islamwissenschaft
auf DiePresse.com]
R.Spencer The
first biography of Mohammed comes out over a 125
years after he died.And that's the first one!And before that, there is just
annoying absence.
There is a little to nothing about him in
islamic tradition, So I put a not in the truth
about Mohammed that
the historical value of all these things wassuspect and there was always
something I wanted to follow up on.
StakelbeckSo for a 125 years
after his dead in 632 there is no mention
specifically of Mohammed in any historical ...
R.Spencer Well,
when we talk about the
125 years, especially the last half of that, the
last 60, there are
mentions of him, but they are very sparse and
vague and non
specific, and some of them don't correspondto what we know from islamic tradition at
all. Thing that he just did not do. But even
more thanthat, the
first 60 years of that, when - that is I am
talking about the period of the great Arab
conquest fromthe
630's to the 690's when they conquered all the
middle east and north Africa and Persia.
Stakelbeck
Peacfully..[laughing]
R.Spencer By
the shear compelling power of the Koran
[laughing] and the words of Mohammed [laughing].Actually, that's
the whole point. There was no Mohammed and there
was no Koran. The
people who were
conquered when they write about what happens,
they never mention that the conquerors
came with the new
religion or a new prophet or a new holy book and
they never called them moslems. And the conquerorsin their own records they never mention
that they have a new religion or Mohammed or a
holy book andin the
coins they issued or in the inscriptions that
they made in the public buildings,
there isnever
one single syllable
about Mohammed or Koran or Islam which is
supposed to be the driving force for
all those
conquests.
StakelbeckThis is fascinating
Robert, First, because you're a great
researcher. You have been done this for three
decades...[..]But the
other fascinating thing is that we had so many
historical inquiries into the Bible, the old and
new testamentthe
existence of Jesus, the existence of Moses. As
far as I know this is
the first real serious effort
todig down into the
real origins of islam.One of the thing that really caught
my attention in the book is what the earliest
Christian and Jewish
records say about islamic conquerors.
Tell us about some of that.
R.Spencer Well,
the funny thing is that in the first place the
never called them islamic conquerers. They say
the Sarracens cameand lade waste, or the
[..]. But they never called them moslems.They never say that they came with a
religion that they said was superior to the
religion that we have, and they nevermention a book or a prophet. And this is
an extraordinary silence when you consider that
this is supposed to be themotivating force for wider conquering in
the first place.
Stakelbeck So, where
did they come from. The whole islamic narrative...Mohammed
is their prophet, Koran is their law.
R.Spencer The
whole thing was built..it was starting of the
690's, and excelerating
in the 700's and especially in the800's when we start to get all the
biographical material about Mohammed.
But it started in the
ladder part ofthe 7th
century and specially
in the 8th. Among the Arab leaders, who had
amassed this empires -and in those days there
were two great powers in the world, the Byzantine
empire and the Persian empire.
Bothwere multinational, multiethnic empires
that were hold together by a common religion.
The Byzantines
were Christians and the Persians were
Zoroastrians. The Arabs came out of Arabia and
conquered all that huge expensiveterritory. Some of them were vague
abrahamic monotheist, some of them were
Christians of various kinds, some of themwere pagans and polytheists, and
so the Arab leaders
developed Islam in order to give their empire a
unifying force and this is one of the reasons
why islam is political, authoritarian,
supremacist, violent, intransigent andintolerant, because it was designed to
strengthen an
empire and to be a political force for cohesion.
Itwas political first
and religious only secondarily.
Stakelbeck ...and
arguibly it is the same way today as well ?
R.Spencer
Precisely!
StakelbeckDo you think this book will possibly
affect the ...
R.Spencer [..]
there is such a debate right now whether
islam is political or religious, the anti-sharia
laws been considered in various states
had been struck down by liberal activist judges
on the ground of islam is purelyreligious and not political.
Though this says that
islam is from the beginning political and not
religious [..] and I amhoping that will have a great impact.
Also we are in the process of translating this
book in the Arabic. Itsgonna be made available as a free pdf
online, and we are hoping to affect a tremendous
transformation in the islamicworld.
StakelbeckWhat
has been the moslem response so far..
R.Spencer Fury
and contempt, nobody with arguments. [..] they
said: Of course that Mohammed existed. It's
in the Koran! [..]
StakelbeckIts
interesting because Jerusalem is never mentioned
in the Koran and they say that Jerusalem is
their third holy city.
It is mentioned hundreds of times in the bible
books.
R.Spencer
Jerusalem is mentioned, in
the hadithes, but the hadith is the
traditions of Mohameds words and deeds
as we have been discussing, they don't
come around until the 9th century, well over
150, sometimes 200 years after mohammedis supposed to have lived. Suddenly we
know all about Mohammed said and did.
It's
legendary material thathas no more value than the stories of
Robin Hood
[..]
↓
APROPOS
Robin
Earlier on this
same day 21.05.12 Ivana told me about
From
my personal viewpoint the question of authenticity of
the islamic scriptures is of a secondary importance.
Since nothing changes in terms of contents, while he
who want to believe in, will continue to do so anyway,
just as I explained how that thing with the proofs
and the
aversion toward the truth works, until
the individual isn't mentally ready for the
TURN AROUND. Those things are less a
question of proofs than a question of the mental
rotation
[DeXter clockwise or sinister counterclockwise]
i/e sinister unwillingness or deXter good will. It is however an endless shame for
those soulless sinister apparatschiks [especially
such one in responsible social and/or political
positions or even some of the 'right'speaker] which do not
come themselves to the just conclusions in regard to what
is right and what is evil/wrong. If Hitler would have
been successful with his attempts to become an Arian
godhood, those same sinister staff would have
acknowledged his national socialism as a religion too. This is the result of
the sinister
counterclock attitude,
the egocentric antispirit of plagiarism, which is the root of the mankinds plagues. And this is
why
Even
a ban on islamic scriptures can not nor shall be based
on the question of authenticity or the existence of
Mohammed which will anyway never be definitely
answered, but shall be a normal sane reaction on the
inhuman, destructive, rootless design of those
contents and their central [authentic or fictive]
figure, called Mohammed, as the alleged highest
example to be followed.
21.05.12 & 22.05.12
Zitat PI 10.06.13
[..] Und der eigentliche Hammer, was die Leute
geradezu mit Mutwill überlesen, da wird eindeutig
gesagt, Mirjam, die Mutter von Isa, war die Schwester
des Aaron, also jene Mirjam, die Prophetin aus dem
Exodus, die die Israelitinnen beim Auszug aus Ägypten
anführt. In Sure
räumt der Koran mit jeder
Möglichkeit auf sich herauszuwinden mit
Gedankenspinnereien. Mirjam war, so doppelt der Koran
nach, die Tochter Amrams, also des Vaters von Aaron.Der Angabe Mirjam,
Schwester des Aaron, Tochter des Amram, war zu einer
Zeit, als es keine Ausweispapiere gab, so gut wie
heute die Versicherungsnummer. Dass der Koran Mirjam nur
als Schwester von Aaron, nicht als Schwester von Aaron
und Moses bezeichnet, das ist eigentlich ein
schlagender Beweis. Man zitiert
direkt aus dem Buch
Exodus. Irrtum ausgeschlossen. Mirjam, die Mutter Isa,
ist nicht die Frau von Josef, dem Bauhandwerker aus
den Evangelien, sie ist jene Mirjam aus dem Buch
Exodus, Schwester des Aaron
Zitat
Wanderfalke,
PI
[..]
Wahrscheinlich hat jeder, der
schon mal mit Mohammedanern diskutiert hat,
das Argument gehört, dass die Frauen durch die
Islamisierung erstmals Rechte genossen hätten.
Auch in der Biographie des „Propheten“ wird in
den ersten Kapiteln Schreckliches über die
Zeit der „Unwissenheit“ des alten Arabiens
berichtet. So wird dort zum Beispiel behauptet,
dass eine Frau als eine Art Besitz des Mannes
einfach weitervererbt werden könne. Auch wird
behauptet, dass eine Frau grundsätzlich nicht
erbberechtigt sei. Mit diesem Unsinn möchte
ich aufräumen [..]
●
Chadidscha,
die erste Frau des Propheten, war die Inkarnation der
unabhängigen und selbstbewussten Frau schlechthin. Sie
entstammte einer angesehenen Mekkaner Familie und
herrschte über ein Handelsimperium. Der „Prophet“ fing
bei ihr als Laufbursche an und erwies sich als
geschickter Karawanenführer und Händler. Die
Initiative zur Eheanbahnung ging von ihr aus. Sie
schickte eine Freundin (sic!), um dem „Propheten“ eine
Avance zu machen. Sie war außerdem wesentlich älter
als er. Ob sie weitere Männer neben ihm hatte, ist
nicht bekannt. Es war aber zu jener Zeit durchaus
üblich und ist
in einigen Gesellschaften
bis heute verbreitete Praxis, darunter pikanterweise
im mehrheitlich muslimischen Norden Nigerias. Er
jedenfalls traute sich
bis zu ihrem Tode
nicht, eine weitere Frau zu heiraten.
●
Interessant ist auch, dass sich die
sogenannte „Ummah“ (Umma), also die Gemeinschaft der
Gläubigen, von dem Wort für Mutter, „Umm“, ableitet (siehe
deutsch-arabische
Wörterbücher).
Ein weiterer Hinweis auf eine (vor-islamische)
matriarchalische
Gesellschaft.
●
Auch im Erbrecht hat sich so einiges
geändert. Während in den Anfängen des Islams in Mekka
Mann und Frau zu gleichen Teilen erbten,
verschlechterte sich die Situation für die Frau später,
indem sie nach der Eroberung Medinas nur halb so viel
erbte wie ein Mann (siehe Koran,
Sure 4, Die Frauen[An-Nisa] Vers 11).
Beim Islam handelt es sich um eine als
Religion verkappte Ideologie, die sich, um zu
expandieren,
der Lüge und der Gewalt
bedient. Und das sowohl bei ihren Feinden als auch bei
ihren Anhängern!
„Der Prophet war ein
gewalttätiger Eroberer und dient deshalb heute Terroristen
als Vorbild.“
„Aber die meisten Muslime verteidigen ihn als unfehlbaren
Verkünder des Wortes Gottes. Bei jeder anderen historischen
Person, die an einem einzigen Tag 600 Juden enthaupten ließ,
hätten wir kein Problem, sie als Verbrecher zu bezeichnen.
Aber bei Mohammed sagt man: Das war damals eben normal. Ich
sage: Nein, war es nicht. Mir ist kein anderer Fall von
Massenenthauptungen bekannt im Arabien jener Zeit, und ich
kenne mich in der islamischen Geschichte wirklich aus.“[Abdel-
Samad]
Unmasking Muhammad
The Malignant Narcissicist and his Grand Delusion Allah
by Sujit Das
[..] When the Muslims look at the prosperity of Western world and look at their pitiable condition they are ashamed. They need a way out. The best way out is to put all the blame on the infidels.
For a Narcissist this is easy. They know how to live in deception. Ever since the birth of Islam, the Muslims live in deception. At the beginning, Muhammad deceived them, then the early rulers of Islam deceived them and finally Muslims have learnt to deceive themselves. Today it had become a second nature to them.
Creativity is a skill that should be developed. It is a natural potential which is incompatible with external and internal rewards or punishments. The Muslim society is so much superstitious that this natural potential of individual Muslims are subdued. It has disastrous consequences. As Shapiro & Purpel (2008, p. 430) wrote,
“Whenever this creativity is impeded, the ultimate result is not simply the absence of creativity, but an actual positive presence of destructiveness”.
However, it would be wrong to think that Muslims’ destructive tendency is completely a result of subdued creativity. Another important factor is abnormal hate. Muslims hate the Jews, Christians, Atheists, Idolaters – practically every non-Muslim. Then there is internal hate. Sunnis and Shiaa sects hate each other. The Ahmadiyyas are hated by both Sunnis and Shiaa sects.
Kurds are hated by some other sects. There are hundreds of sects in Islam. There is tremendous hate and distrust amongst different sects. How do we explain this? This type of hate we cannot see in any culture. USA had nuked Japan in 1945 causing large numbers of deaths and occupied their land for a long time. British occupied India causing great suffering. During Nazi regime, the Germans had caused much destruction to other nations; but, today hatred towards USA is not found in Japan, Hindus no more cherish any malice against the British and Germans are not hated by those nations whom Nazis had attacked. Every culture had forgotten the past and now works together for a better future. Why Muslims are different? It is because; Muhammad’s narcissism works in the diseased minds of Muslims. The deep hatred originated from Muhammad. Since the members of Jewish faith are most vulnerable amongst all, we take the Jews as example to find out the actual reason of Muslims’ hate towards Jews today and how it originated. Muhammad originally described himself as a Jews’ Prophet. To impress the Jews, he incorporated many aspects of Judaism within it and accordingly Allah revealed many verses favorable to them. But when Muhammad demanded that the Jews abandon their own faith and convert to Islam, the Jews declined. With this Muhammad was furious to them and this is the starting point of deep hatred and enmity. When the Jews rejected Muhammad, his false self felt deflected and his narcissistic balloon got punctured. So he strengthened his self-image by diminishing, humiliating or degrading the Jews. Now the question is, by hating the Jews today, after several hundred of years of Muhammad’s death, what Muslims are achieving? Today, Jews-bashing is a political game played by many Muslim nations who have got nothing to do with Israel. Many state controlled newspapers of Muslim nations are full of anti-Jews propaganda. So, this doubt needs to be clarified.
Muhammad had invaded the personality of the Muslims and paralyzed their true selves. This evil Prophet is still living through the lives of his followers. By occupying the Muslim minds, Muhammad made them compatible with his own disorder and secured their submission. After this he made them do what he always dreamt of doing, what he often desired, what he constantly feared of. He compelled them into collaborating in the expression of the repressed side of his personality. The whole Muslim Ummah is a narcissistic supply machine of Muhammad and every individual Muslim is an essential part of it. With deep hatred in his heart, every Muslim, even today, is trying to re-inflate Muhammad’s false ego, his narcissistic balloon which was punctured by those early Jews. With every hateful activity directed towards the Jews, Muslims are still securing narcissistic supply sources to their Prophet. Muhammad is still consuming the narcissistic supply flowing through these human conduits of his own making. [..]